
Recent University of Leeds research suggests that, because of a lower yield, organic farms are worse for biodiversity.
(Another of Lux Viatour's picture: can't access his site at mo, so you can see more here)
The research suggests that there will be a need to ramp up production in light of population growth, and the sacrifice of land to organic farming would thus be too great, notwithstanding 12% more biodiversity on organic farms.
The yield argument is, however, questionable. The research presumes that conventional farming can continue as is � in other words, the research has failed to take into account both the finite nature and climate change-causing elements of fossil fuels in farming and food.
Also, organisations like the UN FAO suggest that productive yield would increase in the places where hunger is most acute, were farmers to change over to organic farming from their current type of farming, which is subsistence farming.
Excluding the contentious issue of yield the biodiversity case for organic farming is strong.
For one thing, Biocides (pesticides, herbicides etc) and biodiversity are in basic terms incompatible. biocides are designed to kill, and they kill both target and non target plants and animals.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service point out that �about 40 pesticides ...are known to kill birds even when applied according to label instructions�. They also point to the difficult to calculate but nonetheless very real fact of indirect bird deaths from pesticides, in highlighting 67 million direct annual bird deaths from agricultural pesticides:
�The number of birds lost in a poisoning event can only be estimated; biologists believe that for each bird carcass found and reported, approximately 100 others are never found� and that since �World War Two, the manufacture and use of pesticides in the United States has increased ten-fold�.
According to a peer reviewed literature review by Hole et al (2005), of 76 studies comparing organic and conventional farming on biodiversity:
66 out of 99 comparisons found organic benefited wildlife more than conventional farming. 25 found mixed results, and 8 against organic. This ranged across all major taxon (insect, plant and animal species).
Neither of the two groups of researchers who conducted this research had a vested interest in organic farming.
Norton et al's (2009) peer reviewed study found that, even comparing like with like - equally �heterogeneous landscapes� in both organic and conventional farms, organic still scores better. In other words, even when there is mixed farming on a varied landscape, the organic farms in these places are still better for wildlife than the conventional ones.
There has been little research in Ireland on biodiversity and farming. O Brien et al (2008) overviews research into biodiversity and arable farming in Ireland. They point out that �only one study has compared the biodiversity of organisms in organic vs conventionally grown crops in Ireland� this study found �a greater abundance (78% higher) and diversity of beetles in the organic plots.�
While lamenting the lack of research, they do point out that �the research that is there suggests that conventional crop cultivation has had an adverse impact on biodiversity on Irish farms, with 15 of the 21 studies demonstrating negative trends for the taxa investigated.�
It is also the case that the farm-related losses in biodiversity in the last 60 years related to conventional farming anyway. According to Dr Gordon Purvis, who led the five-year Ag-Biota project on biodiversity and farming in Ireland ; �while bumblebees as a group are still readily found on typical farmland, our findings reveal that their abundance and diversity on moderately-to-intensively managed farmland may have declined by at least 50 per cent over the past 20-30 years.�
More diversity in plants and animals also means that the planet is more likely to function harmoniously. Monocultures � in farming and nature � expose us to everything from wildfires to famines.
Then there is the farm itself: separating farming and nature can be considered a category error, mainly because organic farms are part of nature and society at one and the same time. The farmed foods are more biodiverse, as is what surrounds them.