
Ahhh. That was a nice break. It's good to be back in the blogosphere after taking some time away. My first posting of 09 deals with the claims that the UK's Soil Association have asked for the organic feed rules to be relaxed.
This is interesting on a number of levels. Firstly, the story seems to be just plain wrong. See
here. Then there is the level of vitriol directed at organics in the many comments that have followed this story around the place. One sloppy piece of journalism in Christmas week and a: the whole media world jumped on it as absolute fact b: many anti-organic ranters and ravers seemed only too happy to fully and completely believe the story and use it as an excuse for a bit of organo-bashing. For a splendid example, see the comments after the overcooked
Times article itself.
Its also interesting to see an organic organisation engage in what seems to be kite flying. Are they seeing the levels of public opposition to such a change? Are they scaring cereal producers into lowering their prices? Are they moving away from organic certification and towards food security?
Another issue highlighted by the price of feed is The UKs over exposure to grain for their cattle farming - dairy and beef. Ireland is at a distinct advantage here.
Finally, the fact that non bovines actually have a non-organic feed component is surely an issue. I can't see the consumer ever imagining this to be the case.
Article begins:
It was recently widely reported that the UK�s largest organic certification body, the Soil Association, was asking for the rules regarding organic feed to be relaxed.
This claim was first mooted in the (UK)
Times on December 22nd, and widely reported after this. According to Valerie Elliot, the Soil Association has asked Hilary Benn, the Rural Affairs Secretary �for approval to relax the rules for an indefinite period. They want their members to be able to use conventional animal feed instead of organic food concentrate, which costs double�.
High feed prices combined with a retracting market were blamed for causing this request for a rules� relaxation. In this context, it was claimed in the Times that some organic farmers wanted a �holiday� from the standards on feed. They would, however, maintain their other organic practices, could not sell their produce as organic, and could later rejoin the organic sector, according to the report.
In
response however, the Soil Association have claimed that the Times� reporter got her facts wrong on the issue.
They find it �disappointing that the Times chose to run an article which suggests that the Soil Association is backing organic farmers by asking for standards to be relaxed. This is not the case at all�
Rather, they claim to be conducting a consultation on the issue: �the proposal being referred to is simply one stage of a consultation process which gives a rationale of why we have an issue that needs attention� they suggest.
While the Times� report seems to have overstated the case, the situation for organic farmers in the UK remains tough at present.
While Irish cattle, sheep and dairy farmers are also under pressure, those I spoke to were not too enamoured with the idea of allowing conventional feed in.
Richard Auler, who runs a mixed enterprise in Tipperary, which includes cattle, felt that a relaxation of the feed rules would be �a very dangerous road to go down�. He claimed that there would be �no advantage to it� and that it would �only confuse customers�.
I also spoke to Fintan Rice, an organic dairy farmer who supplies Glenisk, about the issue.
Fintan suggested that the situation is indeed tough for organic farmers at present, and that he understands why some farmers would ask for a relaxation of the rules.
�The cost of organic cereals is an issue. Our price of milk has dropped. Feed costs up to 600e per tonne, while the price we�re getting looks like being a heck of a lot less than last year� he tells me.
�Margins are very tight at 46c a litre� he continues. Whatever the route, it seems difficult to avoid spending up to 500e per tonne - even when using a partially in-conversion feed.
�When Barley costs 340e per tonne, it then has to be rolled and mixed in the bin. When it�s mixed with soya ends up costing up 500e a tonne�.
Fintan�s cattle consume 5kg of bought-in feed per day, of which 3-4 kg is in-conversion feed.
However, Fintan would not be in favour of a change in the feed rules. Like many Irish organic cattle farmers, �the main feed is grass or silage�. This reduces his exposure to high prices for bought-in feed.
He also points out that the rules were only recently changed to encourage cereal growers to convert part of their holdings to organic. This was done to counteract the shortage of organic feeds available. Changing the feed rules would �weaken the organic cereal sector, and a lot of work was put into getting them over�.
Neither renting suitable land nor growing his own cereals are options for Fintan, though this differs from farmer to farmer.
He remains hopeful that the market will sort itself out: �If the price of milk falls the price of cereal has to fall too. Something will have to give.�
Fintan also points out that �22-23c a litre for conventional milk � that�s not attractive either�.